Rasheeda Mcadoo vs Ekaterina Perelygina Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Mcadoo demonstrates stronger second serve performance, winning 42.21% of points compared to Perelygina’s 36.96%. Could this be a crucial advantage?
• In terms of returning serve, while Perelygina edges Mcadoo by winning 52.39% of second serve return points, Mcadoo lags behind with a lower 50.44% success rate.
• Perelygina shows superior performance returning first serves with 39.27%, outpacing Mcadoo’s 27.92%, pointing toward a key area to watch in their matchup.
• When facing pressure, Mcadoo excels in saving breakpoints, successful at 51.85%, compared to Perelygina’s 33.19%, likely giving Mcadoo a mental toughness edge during critical points.
• Both players have impressive match win rates over the past year; Mcadoo has a 58.33% win rate from 60 matches, whereas Perelygina holds a higher 61.76% win rate from 34 matches. Does frequency over experience provide Mcadoo a preparation edge?
• On clay, Mcadoo’s preferred surface, they win 54% of their matches; this may become vital information if the current match venue is similar.
• Conversely, Perelygina’s best performance on hard surfaces, with a 69% win rate, suggests another potential advantage if the surface matches.
• Player levels and opponents’ quality matter; Mcadoo participates mostly in higher-ranked Challenger/ITF events and faces opponents with a rank average of 438.73, while Perelygina plays Futures tournaments against opponents averaging 195.29 rank, indicating a substantial difference in competition level.
• Although both players excel in deciding sets, Perelygina slightly outpaces Mcadoo with a 71% winning rate compared to 69%, which could prove influential if the match extends to a deciding set.
• Perelygina is more effective in converting breakpoints at 44.21% than Mcadoo’s 35.33%, which is a critical stat to monitor during high-pressure situations.

Editorial Prediction (May 27, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis matchup, Mcadoo and Perelygina bring distinct strengths to the court. Mcadoo’s robust second serve and breakpoint-saving capabilities hint at crucial strengths when navigating tight scorelines, particularly under pressure.

Perelygina holds the advantage with superior first serve returns and breakpoint conversion rates, which could significantly shift the momentum in her favor during pivotal junctures of the match.

Mcadoo’s experience against higher-level opponents may equip them with resilience, addressing any challenges Perelygina presents with her recent performance statistics.

Ultimately, based on performance patterns, match-form, and surface preferences, Perelygina is slightly favored to claim victory in this encounter, given her recent trends and effective points conversion skills.